Review: Suite Francaise


Book Title: Suite Francaise
Author: Irene Nemirovsky
Original Publication Date: 2004 (written in 1942)
Edition Read:
2006 Knopf
Total Pages:
395
Genre:
Classic Historical Fiction
Reason Read:
Found on Amazon as a gift for my mother; she gave thumbs up as did Sandy, neither of whom steer me wrong
Rating:
5 out of 5 Stars

“He wanted to write a story about these charming little horses, a story that would evoke this day in July, this land, this farm, these people, the war – and himself.

“He wrote with a chewed-up pencil stub, in a little notebook which he hid against his heart. He felt he had to hurry: something inside him was making him anxious, was knocking on an invisible door.” – Page 179

If you love lyrical prose and character development, I highly recommend this enjoyable book. I really loved this book the farther along I went as more details were revealed about the characters. The way their paths crossed to help formulate their destinies was something that the author, Irene Nemirovsky, was working passionately towards when her own life ended abruptly in Auschwitz.

As she was living through the invasion of Paris, the defeat of France and the Occupation by Nazis of the village where she and her family were staying, she was frantically writing an epic work of the times and moments she saw that she hoped would be a masterpiece on par with her literary idols such as Tolstoy.

Instead of writing about the persecution of Jews leading up to and throughout the war or the battles going on to defend France, Irene Nemirovsky chose to focus instead on the everyday lives of the people whose lives were disrupted during the invasion and occupation in the cities and villages of the Occupied Zone in France. She wrote so beautifully about the details, making it easy to feel the constant contrasts of the time – pride and shame, victory and defeat, freedom and captivity, love and lust, courage and fear, greed and selflessness, wealth and poverty.

The first section, Storm In June, deals with the flight from Paris of its citizens anticipating the approach of the Germans. It portrays how all castes of people were thrown in a muddled and frantic journey together – and the ugliness instincts of self preservation can bring out. It also introduces us to the characters who will wind their way through the rest of her grand novel.

The second section, Dolce (Sweet), focuses on a particular village and surrounding farms of an Estate in a country village near the demarcation line. It deals with the relationships between the defeated French citizens and their new German rulers occupying their village and living amongst them in their homes.

Dolce is the better of the two sections because of the humanization of the characters and their emotions. I was left craving more – something that we will never completely know because this is an unfinished work. Thankfully, the Appendices provide a fascinating peek into the author’s thoughts and writing process during the creation of the sections she was able to complete, along with the remaining three that she did not have enough time to get out.

Through these notations we see the direction she had in mind for her characters and which ones would be more prominent. We are also reminded that she was waiting for life to happen so she would know the final destination history would dictate for her characters. Sadly, her goal of contrasting individual versus collective destiny was not completed because her own fate ended too soon. The story of her manuscript’s journey through her daughters is something in and of itself. So much so that I visited an exhibit in NYC several years ago to learn how her manuscript survived and went undiscovered for so long, and to see her artifacts for myself. In a way, perhaps her personal destiny to create the pages we have versus the collective destiny of the manuscript’s survival to reach our eyes is the embodiment of her goal after all.

As she wrote July 1, 1942, two weeks before she was sent to Auschwitz and just over a month before she died:

“Which all in all would correspond to my deepest conviction. What lives on:

1 Our humble day-to-day lives

2 Art

3 God”

Advertisements

About thebumbles

In addition to online Freelance Writing, Molly blogs about books on Quirky Girls Read and about everything else on The Bumbles Blog. Visit her often and let her know what you think! Unless you are a Yankee fan - then there might be a problem ;0)
This entry was posted in Classics, Fiction, historical fiction, Posts by Molly. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Review: Suite Francaise

  1. I love this author, so sad he life was cut short.

  2. jehara says:

    Oh Molly, what a beautifully written review. I’ve had this book on my shelves for a while. It’s about time I pick it up.

  3. Debbie says:

    I have to agree with your mom that Suite Francaise was outstanding. I read it a few years ago and past in on to my daughter who also gave the book a thumbs up.

  4. Reblogged this on Anakalian Whims and commented:
    I don’t think anyone can truly appreciate this book until they know the following: When Nemirovsky was writing the book she originally meant it to be five parts, but she only finished two: Storm in June and Dolce, these two parts are what makes up Suite Francaise. These five parts though, were each individually fashioned (in writing style) after the five parts of Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony. Storm in June’s chapters are short and sweet, choppy, slightly repititious in nature. Dolce is a little more long winded and flowy. Imagine the beauty of the completed work, if she had lived to finish it. Without this critical information I was irritated by her repitition. I thought perhaps it hadn’t been through the proper editing because she died before the novel was completed. But listening to Beethoven and knowing what she was fashioning this all after, putting the war in terms of music, within a novel. Its beautifully fascinating. What made her think of it? How wonderful would the entire book have been had she lived to complete it? The story was interesting and the writing good, but for some reason I just didn’t enjoy it as much as I think I should have. I expected this to be a four or five star book for me, easily, based on reviews and whatnot. Instead, I just liked it, and was far more fascinated by the appendices at the end. I loved her notes and journal entries, it was so amazing to be inside her head for those brief moments.

  5. jennygirl says:

    I’ve read Nemirovsky’s short stories and they were quite delicious as well. They felt like longer stories. This has been on my list forever. Thanks for the reminder and fab review

  6. stacybuckeye says:

    My mom is reading this right now and was talking about how much she loved it over the weekend. Now I’ll be looking forward to her passing it on.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s